Hang on... this was the question:
"HIPs may well prove to be a hassle but how can this be proof when HIPs aren't even a requirement yet?"
And this is your answer:
QUOTE:
Why should the home selling public be forced in to paying up to £700 for something they do not want, and can quite legally avoid
D'ya see the difficulty the reader has in lending credibilty to your posts? I give you all these opportunities to expand on your numerous Daily Mail clippings, but you can never answer it straight-on (prolly 'cos the Daily Wail hasn't written them out for you yet).
I, OTOH, am
aaalways happy to help where I can - No hiding for me young Christopher, nooo...
So let me address your question, in 3 parts (I hope you can extend the same courtesy).
QUOTE:
Why should the home selling public be forced in to paying
I actually have some empathy for that - If HIPs does prove to improve the homebuying process, then it will be worth it... but...
QUOTE:
paying up to £700
You see... leaping and prancing in the dark again aren't you - Let me repeat something you should already be aware of Christopher:
HIPs are not a requirement yet (Do you know anyone that has bought one?). So where are you getting these numbers from?
... Oh, of course: The Daily Wail!
QUOTE:
and can quite legally avoid
For the umpteenth time: How?
(To save your dignity, I wouldn't advise you to say, parents, aunt's; man-in-the-pub.)<br><br>Post edited by: SocialMike, at: 2007/06/18 19:24